Chu on ThisRandom Thoughts
chuextreme
read my profile
sign my guestbook

Visit chuextreme's Xanga Site!

Name: Alex
Gender: Male


Message: message me


Member Since: 10/22/2006

SubscriptionsSites I Read

Posting Calendar

|<< oldest | newest >>|
view all weblog archives

Get Involved!

Suggest a link

Recommend to friend

Create a site


Friday, June 29, 2007

Influence of Jesus

I was thinking one day about how influential Jesus is even to this day.  His teachings have been used to do great good and misused to do great evil.  It causes some people to dedicate their lives and even martyr themselves for something they can't see, feel, or touch.  On the other hand it creates seclusionist fanatics that separate themselves from others and condemn the world.  Needless to say he definitely left his mark on the world. 

But the craziest thing to me about all this is that he never bothered to write anything.  Think about all the most influential people in the world from ancient days until now and everyone else has written stuff.  Jesus, the most influential of them all, didn't even have to write anything.  It has simply been his story that has carried the influence around. 

This makes me wonder about what he wrote in the sand that day when the crowd was about to stone the adulterous women (John 8:1-11). 

"1But Jesus went to the Mount of Olives. 2At dawn he appeared again in the temple courts, where all the people gathered around him, and he sat down to teach them. 3The teachers of the law and the Pharisees brought in a woman caught in adultery. They made her stand before the group 4and said to Jesus, "Teacher, this woman was caught in the act of adultery. 5In the Law Moses commanded us to stone such women. Now what do you say?" 6They were using this question as a trap, in order to have a basis for accusing him.

   But Jesus bent down and started to write on the ground with his finger. 7When they kept on questioning him, he straightened up and said to them, "If any one of you is without sin, let him be the first to throw a stone at her." 8Again he stooped down and wrote on the ground.

 9At this, those who heard began to go away one at a time, the older ones first, until only Jesus was left, with the woman still standing there. 10Jesus straightened up and asked her, "Woman, where are they? Has no one condemned you?"

 11"No one, sir," she said.
      "Then neither do I condemn you," Jesus declared. "Go now and leave your life of sin."

He wrote something twice in the sand.  I know it's not possible to know what he wrote but I think it must have been something pretty crazy.  I love this story because its so powerful but now I get distracted by imagining what and how to find out what he wrote.  It was the only recorded instance of him writing something and I just want to believe it was somehow preserved/burned into the ground somehow and one day archeologists will discover it.

So in conclusion I just want to say how crazy I think it is that Jesus is so influential and he did it through action, not theoretical philosophies.  He just simply lived and loved people the best way possible.  Amazing.  To think that me, an Asian American man, professes a faith who origins are Jewish and continued on in the Middle East, from a small sect of men 2000 years ago.  All this from a man who didn't write a thing, except in that lucky, sandy plot of earth. 


Tuesday, October 24, 2006

Does God exists?

So my microbio teacher said there use to be a class where they tried to prove or disprove God or existence of intelligent design.  I thought that was cool and wondered what I would be able to come up with.  So I thought about it but can't imagine a way to actually be able to prove it scientifically.  Anyone have any ideas?

Also I was wondering if there was a logical way to disprove God.  I've always heard comments like, "God can't exist because look at what the church has done and the corruption that's still there" or "I believe in evolution since we can scientifically prove it".  However, that doesn't exactly disprove if there is a God or some master intelligent designer.  So is there a way to actually disprove God?  Anyone have an idea?

I do have some random thoughts about the topic I'd like to share.  If life did evolve from randomly moving particles, it means that consciousness and life as we know it also evolved from this same randomness.  Isn't it then possible that in this great expanse of the universe, saying that evolution is the only process to produce life, that there is a supreme consciousness that evolved like we did, only greater?  And if this consciouness was great enough it could then produce life and design everything that we know of life now?  Wouldn't this consciousness continue to evolve to be even greater and transcend time and space? And then could we even say it evolved?  If It trascended time and space, then It would have no beginning and no end and It would have gone beyond Its own evolution and could claim It always was and was always there and will always be there.  Is it possible?

What is the closest number to zero?  is it .00001?  no because .00000001 is closer,  and .00000000000001 is even closer.  How far can we go?  Of course it would be infinity zero's and then a one.  But then you could even add another zero to that.  So I ask again, what is the closest number to zero?  The fact is there is no answer and no one can claim an answer.  You cannot capture the number on paper and in mathematics it would simply be rounded to zero because it is a useless number; too small to be useful.  But it does exist right?  It must be there or else we couldn't answer the next question.
What is the number one?  isn't it the sum of all its parts?  1 is the sum or one hundred .01.  Or the sum of one thousand .001's....and so on and so forth. It would also therefore be the sum of "the number closest to zero" added by number of times of the reciprocal of "the number closest to zero".   But again, if we can't give answer to what the number closest to zero is, how do we get to the number one?  If we can't physically quantify "the number closest to zero" how do we come up with the quantity of one?  Can you make something from nothing; in this case, the nothing being "the number closest to zero" and the something being the quantity of one. 
Is it possible then to come to the conclusion that the quantity of "1" is more then the sum of it's parts?  But what more could it be?  What is the "more"?   What made the quantity of "one" possible? 
If you do believe the the answer to this is still that .0000(infinite amount of zero's)1, and it is the only and easy answer to the question, then wouldn't it take and infinite amount of summations to make the number one? Wouldn't that simply mean that 1 is the same as infinity?  Since you could never reach infinity and it is only an idea rather then an actual value, you would never reach the summation of one.  Therefore wouldn't one just simply have to exist?
Can you prove what was asked scientifically?  If you can, then I'll ask an even harder question (or at least I think it is).  What is the second closest number to zero?  Initially it sounds easy because its just adding itself to itself the itself.  Kind of like .01 + .01 is .02.  But try writing that on paper.  .00000(infinity zero's)2...... that can't be right.   There would be a number inbetween those numbers if that were the case.  The number inbetween would .0000(infinite zero's)(1.5).  So again I ask, what is the second closest number to zero?  Harder to describe than it sounds I think.  Unless I'm not thinking hard enough, which is most likely the case.  Regardless, I'm going to jump to conclusions again and point out that even if we could say what the number closest to zero is we couldn't really say what the second closes number to zero is.  And therefore again I ask, how do we get to the number one?  If we can't say what the second closest number is then we certainly can't say what the third is and so on and so forth.  How do we get to One?  I conclude we can't. 
But the fact is that it is still there.  Everything that exists follows this principle of summation.  For example, a person is made of cells.  Cells are made of small parts called organelles.  Those are made of molecules, which are composed of atoms. Atoms are composed of electrons, neutrons, and protons.  Those are made of quarks, positrons, and other stuff.  All this is made of energy.  This energy is composed of one or more of something.  This something can be divided by 2, and that something can be divided by 2, and then by 2 again, and again and again...infinitely.  This 2 is finally divided by itself and makes 1.  And what is this one made of?  Everything we talked about earlier.  So are we all more then the sum of our parts?  Most defiantly I believe.  Something had to create one.  Something had to go beyond infinity to make one possible.  After one was made everything else with matter can exist. 
What do you all think? 


Sunday, October 22, 2006

I gave in

Xanga
I finally gave in and joined Xanga.  I hope I will be able to post honest and well thought journal entries which promote deep thoughts or make everyone laugh.  God Bless you all!

-Alex